Case details

Print
Anticompetitive practices
Case reference
PRC/2012/8
Entities involved
  • Brisa - Auto-Estradas de Portugal, SA
Natural persons involved
No
Sector
  • Trade and Services
  • Transport & Infrastructure
Activity (NACE)
  • H52 - Warehousing and support activities for transportation (include cargo handling)
Investigated practice
  • Abuse of dominant position
Legal provisions
  • European-TFEU-Article 102
  • National-Law 18/2003-Article 6
Case origin
Entity
Dawn raids
No
Cooperation with sector regulators
  • AMT - Mobility and Transport Authority
Status
Closed
AdC’s decision
Filing decision
Settlement
Sanction imposed
Summary of the case

On December 20, 2012, the Competition Authority (AdC) opened an investigation against BRISA Auto-Estradas de Portugal, SA (Brisa), based on the participation presented by the Institute of Road Infrastructure, IP, (InIR), to investigate the terms of the public tender for the concession of motorway lanes and associated road assemblies in the districts of Porto and Aveiro.

After the analysis, the possibility of “a concerted predatory pricing practice” was ruled out, since Brisa and the AEDL - Douro Litoral Motorways (AEDL) Grouping were considered a single company for the purposes of the scheme. competition law.

The existence of predatory pricing in the construction of motorway sections of the motorway under consideration was also excluded, since the costs foreseen in the final bid of the AEDL competitor were higher than the construction costs included in the final bid of the losing competitor. Considering that any such practice has to be measured by comparing the total costs of the project with the profitability of the project, the basic and subsequently adjusted financial projections of the Consortium led by Brisa showed positive profitability rates, with no evidence of losses.

Thus, even if Brisa holds a dominant position, its conduct would not have been an abuse of that position.

Therefore, it was concluded that there was no evidence of prohibited practices, and the AdC filed the case on March 11, 2014.

Timeline
2014-03-11
2012-12-20
Case initiation
Click here to see your activities