Case details

Print
Anticompetitive practices
Case reference
PRC/2007/2
Entities involved
  • Eurest (Portugal) - Sociedade Europeia de Restaurantes, Lda.
  • ICA - Indústria e Comércio Alimentar, SA.
  • Sodexo Portugal - Restauração e Serviços, SA
  • TRIVALOR - Sociedade Gestora de Participações Sociais, SA
  • Uniself - Sociedade de Restaurantes Públicos e Privados, SA
Natural persons involved
Yes
Sector
  • Public Procurement 
  • Supply and Food Industry
  • Trade and Services
Activity (NACE)
  • I56 - Food and beverage service activities
Investigated practice
  • Horizontal agreement
  • Horizontal agreement
Legal provisions
  • National-Law 18/2003-Article 4
Case origin
Leniency
Dawn raids
Yes
Cooperation with sector regulators
Status
Closed
AdC’s decision
Sanctioning decision
Settlement
Sanction imposed
  • Eurest (Portugal) - Sociedade Europeia de Restaurantes, Lda. - €5,207,746.61
  • ICA - Indústria e Comércio Alimentar, SA. - €634,387.87
  • Natural person(s) - €21,000.00
  • Sodexo Portugal - Restauração e Serviços, SA - €357,337.76
  • TRIVALOR - Sociedade Gestora de Participações Sociais, SA - €6,778,686.20
  • Uniself - Sociedade de Restaurantes Públicos e Privados, SA - €1,742,124.83
Summary of the case

This is the first AdC case opened based on a leniency application, and the first case in which members of the corporate bodies are accused, together with the companies, under article 47/2 of Law 18/2003.

The present infringement proceeding, opened by the Board of the AdC on 2.02.2007, arose from a statement of infringement brought to the knowledge of the AdC services through an application submitted, under the terms and for the purposes of the special exemption or mitigation regime provided for in Law no. 39/2006, of 25 August (hereinafter referred to as "Leniency Application"), as well as through complementary statements made under the scope of the duty to co-operate with the AdC, as provided for in that legal regime, by Mr. Manuel Maria Sá Coutinho de Lancastre, General Manager of Eurest, the applicant and the defendant, who informed the AdC that the defendant companies and Eurest, Trivalor,Uniself,ICA, Sodexo, Cecilia M. Andrade G. Silva (Sodexo),Manuel António Ribeiro Sevinate de Sousa,Mateus da Silva Alves,Carlos Alberto dos Santos Martins Moura e José Luis Silvestre Cordeiro) had agreed to fix prices and market shares in the market for the provision of meals supply services, in the hospital, school, prison, industry and services sectors. On 31.07.2012 the AdC issued a Condemnatory Decision for infringement of Article 4 of Law 18/2003. On 31.07.2012 a condemnatory decision was issued for proving the practice of which they had been accused, namely the infringement of the provisions of paragraph 1 of Article 4 of Law 18/2003. Following the above-mentioned condemnatory decision, on 12 October 2010, the Court ordered the performance of additional measures of proof requested by the defendant Trivalor. On 24.12.2009, the AdC issued a new Condemnatory Decision for infringing article 4 of Law 18/2003. The condemned companies and the fines applied are: EUREST (Portugal) - Sociedade Europeia deRestaurantes, Lda, a fine of 5,207,746.61 million euros; TRIVALOR- SociedadeGestora de Participações Sociais, S.A (which holds the companies Gertal and Itau), a fine of 6,778,686.20 million euros; UNISELF - Gestão e Exploração de Restaurantes de Empresas,S.A., a fine of EUR 1,742,124.83 million; and ICA - Indústria e ComércioAlimentar, S.A. / NORDIGAL - Indústria de Transformação Alimentar, S.A., a fine of EUR 634,387.87 thousand.
The Competition Authority also sentenced five members of the management bodies of the companies in question under Article 47(3) of Law 18/2003 for being aware of practices restricting competition and refraining from preventing them, and imposed fines totalling 20,000.00 thousand to directors and/or managers of Sodexo, ICA/Nordigal, Uniself, Itau and Gertal. The complainant, a former director of one of the defendant companies, was exempted from paying the fine.

Timeline
2013-07-22
Press release
2012-07-31
2011-10-28
Press release
2008-09-01
Statement of objections
2007-02-02
Case initiation
Judicial phase chronology - Interlocutory appeals
Judicial phase chronology - Final decision appeal
Click here to see your activities