Case details

Print
Anticompetitive practices
Case reference
PRC/2017/7
Entities involved
  • Auchan Portugal  Hipermercados, S.A.
  • Cooplecnorte - Aquisição e Fornecimento de Bens e Serviços, C.R.L.
  • ITMP ALIMENTAR, S.A.
  • Lidl & Companhia
  • Modelo Continente - Hipermercados, S.A.
  • Pingo Doce - Distribuição Alimentar, SA
  • Primedrinks - Comercialização de Bebidas Alcoólicas e Produtos Alimentares, S.A.
Natural persons involved
No
Sector
  • Supply and Food Industry
Activity (NACE)
  • G46 - Wholesale trade (include commission trade), except of motor vehicles and motorcycles
  • G47 - Retail trade, except of motor vehicles and motorcycles
Investigated practice
  • Horizontal agreement
  • Vertical agreement
Legal provisions
  • European-TFEU-Article 101
  • National-Law 19/2012-Article 9
Case origin
Ex-officio
Dawn raids
Yes
Cooperation with sector regulators
Status
Closed
AdC’s decision
Sanctioning decision
Settlement
Sanction imposed
  • Auchan Portugal  Hipermercados, S.A. - €10,790,000.00
  • Cooplecnorte - Aquisição e Fornecimento de Bens e Serviços, C.R.L. - €2,060,000.00
  • ITMP ALIMENTAR, S.A. - €11,070,000.00
  • Lidl & Companhia - €10,550,000.00
  • Modelo Continente - Hipermercados, S.A. - €75,630,000.00
  • Pingo Doce - Distribuição Alimentar, SA - €45,450,000.00
  • Primedrinks - Comercialização de Bebidas Alcoólicas e Produtos Alimentares, S.A. - €7,010,000.00
Summary of the case

At least from May 2007 to May 2017, Primedrinks, a company specialized in the distribution of alcoholic beverages in Portugal, and the major food retailers under investigation (“Auchan”, “Cooplecnorte”, “ITMP”, “Lidl”, “MCH” and “Pingo Doce”) resorted to their vertical relation to horizontally promote the retail price fixing of Primedrinks products (hub-and-spoke agreement). The practice under investigation comprised a cross-check mechanism of retail prices charged by the retailers as a mean to ensure price alignment, as well as the regular report to Primedrinks so that it would monitor and pressure for retail price readjustments whenever deviations were identified.

If prices were not adjusted to achieve retail price alignment, the food retailers would threaten Primedrinks with the suspension of purchases or compensation for loss of profit as a result of lower prices. Primedrinks also retaliate against the deviating retailers, by cutting, or threatening to cut, supplies.


In March 2019, the AdC adopted the respective Statement of Objections, having given the opportunity to the affected companies to exercise their right to be heard and defence, which was duly assessed and considered in the final decision.
The AdC also carried out, during the preliminary investigation phase, complementary diligences of evidence requested by the targeted companies, whose results were also considered in the final decision. The Final Decision was adopted on 18 December 2020.
Modelo Continente, Pingo Doce, Auchan and Intermarché, as they had already been condemned in a first decision (PRC/2017/1), were applied, in legal cumulation, single competition fines.

Timeline
Judicial phase chronology - Interlocutory appeals
Judicial phase chronology - Final decision appeal
Click here to see your activities